Last updated: June 11, 2026 at 12:01 AM

Updated Hypothesis Document

Buffalo River Watershed — Running Hypothesis Document

Last updated: 2026-06-10 (Day 102 — recession-only day appended; document carried forward complete from Day 102 rebuild) Events observed to date: 19 confirmed rainfall-runoff events + multiple sub-threshold non-detections + 3 clean recession-only baseline days (Days 95, 97, and Day 102 high-flow recession tail of Event 19)

Study Context

Events

Recession Behavior

Rating Curve Observations

Cross-Event Findings

Detection thresholds (Q1) — zone-averaged QPE required for measurable mainstem rise: - Boxley: ~0.5" wet/moist; ~1.0" dry (pool-fill barrier); sub-detection at 0.3" even wet, 0.5" even dry-moderate. - Ponca/Pruitt: ~0.3" wet; ~0.5" dry; Pruitt response dominated by upstream routing — local-zone forcing produces small response even at 0.8–1.0" if no upstream signal. - St. Joe: ~0.5" zone-avg with concentrated cells; ~0.3" if spatially uniform across 14 HUC12s with wet antecedent; sub-detection even at 0.45" if recession baseflow dominates. - Richland: ~0.25" with concentrated headwater bullseye on moist soil; ~0.5" otherwise; karst noise floor ±0.03–0.05 ft. - Bear Cr: dry-antecedent threshold >0.9–1.1" (Events 11–13 confirm); wet-antecedent threshold ~0.4" (Event 17). High structural absorption. - Harriet: direct-zone responses small unless concentrated >0.6"; dominated by upstream propagation.

Transfer ratios — Boxley (height ft/inch zone QPE): - Dry, low-intensity: 0.36 (Event 5, 0.55") - Dry, high-intensity (>0.5"/hr): 0.62–0.82 (Events 7, 9, 11 — intensity overruns pool storage) - Moderate: 0.56–0.67 (Events 6, 10) - Wet/moist: 0.71–0.84 (Events 2, 3) - Very wet/wet, primed: 1.30 (Event 4) — pool-fill primer mechanism - Very wet + extreme intensity: 2.28 (Event 19 Day 100) — study high

Transfer ratios — Pruitt: - Antecedent-INDEPENDENT at ~1.4 ft/in when forcing is concentrated and routing contribution is present. Dry (Event 9: 1.44) ≈ wet (Events 8, 15: 1.4–1.9) ≈ moist (Event 10: 1.6). - Distributed sub-1" forcing on dry zone with no upstream signal: <0.1 ft/in (Events 12, 17 anomalies — local-zone-only responses are sub-detection at Pruitt). - Two-mode response (Events 12, 15): surface peak at 4–7 hr lag + karst/subsurface secondary at 19–22 hr — consistent with local-knowledge karst losses between Ponca and Pruitt.

Transfer ratios — Richland: - Dry/recovering: 0.16–0.25 ft/in (Events 9, 11; Event 19 Pulse 3 ~0.24) - Dry, event-scale: 0.73 (Event 11, 1.32" zone) - Moist: 0.90 (Event 13, event-scale anchor) - Moist + high intensity: 1.34 ft/in (Event 10, 1.43" with 0.83"/hr peak) — moist + intensity can exceed wet - Wet/saturated, out-of-bank: 2.69 ft/in (Event 15, 8.89 ft peak) — channel-geometry nonlinearity - Recession-falling-limb: 0.5–0.6 ft/in (Event 8 secondary)

Transfer ratios — Bear Cr (most stage-and-antecedent-sensitive): - Dry (Event 11): 0.09–0.17 ft/in — extreme damping - Dry + intensity (Event 9): 0.35 ft/in - Moist (Events 7, 12): 0.22–0.25 ft/in - Moist + bimodal compound (Events 8, 15): 0.97–1.53 ft/in - Wet + low pre-event stage (Event 16): 2.08 ft/in — study high - Wet + mid-stage recession (Event 17): 0.51 ft/in - Bear Cr transfer is stage-AND-antecedent-dependent. Dry → ~0.1; moist → ~0.3; wet+low-stage → ~2.0; wet+mid-stage → ~0.5.

Transfer ratios — St. Joe / Harriet (cumulative event-scale, ft/in zone-avg): - St. Joe: dry 1.09 (Event 11), moist 1.3–2.1 (Events 8, 10, 19 secondary), wet ~3.0 (Event 15 flood scale). Wet-amplification factor ~3×. - Harriet: dry 0.76 (Event 11), moist ~0.8–1.4, wet ~1.4–3.0 (Event 15). Tracks St. Joe with slight attenuation.

Lag times — mainstem cascade peak-to-peak (lag = peak QPE-or-upstream-peak to peak gauge response): - Boxley→Ponca: 1.75–5 hr (1.75 hr at flood, 3–5 hr at moderate, 5 hr+ at low flow) - Ponca→Pruitt (velocity ∝ Q^0.35 confirmed across 5 events): ~5.75 hr at >1500 cfs (1.2 m/s) | 7.5 hr at ~500 cfs (0.93 m/s) | 10.75 hr at ~300 cfs (dry) | 14–15 hr at ~150–180 cfs (low flow, 0.46 m/s) | 14 hr at ~200 cfs (Event 6) - Pruitt→St. Joe: 11–14 hr wet/flood | 17–23 hr dry/low-flow | Slow segment — accounts for most of dry-condition cascade extension (~46% slower than wet) - St. Joe→Harriet: 8–11 hr — ANTECEDENT-INSENSITIVE. 6 hr at flood (Events 8, 15); 8.25 hr at moderate (Event 19); 11.25 hr at dry-mainstem (Event 11). Channel geometry between these two gauges is uniform/less karst — minimal antecedent dependence. - Total Boxley→Harriet: 27 hr at flood (Event 2) | 33 hr at wet (Events 4, 7) | 36 hr at dry (Event 11) | 44.5–52 hr at dry+low-flow (Events 9, 10 secondary).

Wet/dry asymmetries: 1. Boxley pool-fill mechanism: dry-antecedent forcing must first fill upstream pools before reaching gauge. Threshold ~0.5"; <0.5" produces sub-detection; >0.8" produces 8–11 hr delayed accelerating rise; ≥1.0" with primer or wet antecedent produces 2–4 hr rapid response. Local knowledge confirmed. 2. Pruitt's antecedent-independence at high concentrated forcing but extreme sensitivity to upstream routing presence (zero local response possible at 0.8"+ if no upstream signal). 3. Bear Cr structural damping under dry (0.09–0.17 ft/in) vs amplification under wet+low-stage (2.0+ ft/in) — 10–20× range. Stage-on-rating-curve matters as much as antecedent moisture. 4. Richland intensity-dependence: at moist antecedent, high-intensity bursts (>1"/hr) produce 4–5 hr flash with 1.3+ ft/in transfer, exceeding even saturated-wet ratios at lower intensity. 5. St. Joe distributed-forcing dilution: same total QPE produces lower per-inch transfer when spatially distributed across all 14 HUC12s vs concentrated bullseyes (Event 2 vs Event 4 vs Event 15).

Forcing-magnitude and spatial-coherence findings: - Event 12 paradox: Moist-antecedent transfer ratios LOWER than dry-antecedent Event 11 when Event 12 forcing was distributed sub-1.0" across HUC12s. Threshold effect: below ~1.0" zone-average, response efficiency drops regardless of antecedent. Initial abstraction + interception absorbs distributed small bursts even on wet soil. - Spatial coherence matters: Event 11 (broad watershed-wide pulse, 09–12 CDT cores) produced larger responses than Event 12 (spatially shifting two-day distribution with no single coherent pulse) despite Event 12's wetter antecedent and similar zone-totals.

Upstream-only flood attenuation (Event 19 finding): - Pruitt flood (2130 cfs) and Ponca flood (1920 cfs) on Day 100 attenuated through routing/channel storage to St. Joe 2900 cfs (36% of 8000 cfs flood threshold) and Harriet 2860 cfs (30% of 9370 cfs flood threshold). - Upper-basin-only flood-scale events do NOT propagate flood conditions to mid/lower mainstem. Contrast with Event 15 (watershed-wide forcing) where flood-threshold was exceeded at all four mainstem gauges with cfs and at St. Joe 1.8× / Harriet 1.6× threshold. - Implication: flood-warning logic must distinguish upper-only vs watershed-wide forcing patterns from QPE. - Recession-tail corollary (Day 102): even an attenuated upstream-only flood produces a sustained multi-day Optimal recreation window at the lower mainstem — St. Joe and Harriet remained mid-Optimal (1270/1650 cfs) ~Day 4 of the Event 19 recession. The flood pulse is brief and upstream-confined, but the elevated-baseflow tail is multi-day and basin-wide.

Signal-separation logic — validated across multiple events: - Richland gauge as St. Joe-area discriminator: Event 10 (Richland rose → St. Joe primary peak Richland-driven), Event 16 (Richland flat → St. Joe rebound Cave/Big Cr-driven), Event 19 (Richland flat → St. Joe peak pure mainstem propagation). Reliable diagnostic. - Bear Cr gauge as Harriet-area discriminator: Events 5, 16, 19 all show Bear Cr flat while Harriet rose = mainstem propagation confirmed. Event 8 shows Bear Cr surged independently while Harriet also rose = compound source. Reliable diagnostic. - St. Joe double-peak structure observable when Richland flashes earlier than Pruitt mainstem signal arrives (Event 10): primary tributary peak + secondary mainstem peak separated by ~22 hr at low-mid flow.

Recreational threshold crossings observed in study: - Hailstone Low-Floatable (Boxley 3.7 ft): crossed in Events 4 (briefly), 8 (32 hr — exceeds local "rarely >24 hr"), 19 (Day 100 5.50 ft Optimal+). - Boxley-Ponca section (3.2 ft): crossed in Events 2, 4, 8, 19. - Upper Richland Low-Floatable (Richland 3.2 ft): crossed in Events 4 (~14.5 hr), 8 (peak 4.89 ft ~Optimal), 15 (peak 8.89 ft far above High). 3 confirmed runs in study window — consistent with "3–7 runs per year" local expectation. - Mainstem Optimal durations from major events: Events 4+5+6 stacking → ~21 days continuous Optimal at St. Joe/Harriet (extended by secondary forcing); Event 15+16 stacking → ~15+ days; Event 19 → ~5+ days (confirmed: still mid-Optimal at St. Joe/Harriet on Day 102, Day 4 of recession).

Open Questions / Next Watches

  1. Spatial-coherence threshold quantification: Below what zone-aggregated coherence does forcing-magnitude dominance break down? Event 12 vs Event 11 contrast is qualitative; need more data points.
  2. Pruitt's local-zone forcing transfer in absence of upstream signal: Event 17 produced near-zero Pruitt response from 1.02" Cove Cr. Confirm with another upstream-dry / Pruitt-zone-wet event.
  3. Bear Cr stage-dependence function: Refine the rating-curve geometry / floodplain breakout point. Current estimates: <3.5 ft pre-event stage → 1.5–2.0 ft/in; 3.5–4.0 ft → 0.5–1.0 ft/in; >5.0 ft → <0.5 ft/in (out-of-bank flattening).
  4. March 2024 reference event signature: Event 15 approached but did not equal it (15.05 ft / 14,500 cfs vs ~15 ft / ~17,000 cfs). Distributed Event 15 forcing vs concentrated 2024 Richland-bullseye explains discrepancy; need a Richland-concentrated 3"+ event to fully calibrate.
  5. Bear Cr long-lag character: 26 hr (Event 7) vs 9 hr (Event 9) vs 4 hr (Event 16) — spans 6× range. Lag appears antecedent-driven (dry slow, wet fast) but n=small per condition. Confirm pattern.
  6. Ungauged-watershed monitoring gap: Event 15 deposited 6.087" on Long Cr (HUC 0505) with 1.584"/hr peak — flash flood potential downstream of Harriet invisible to gauge network. Recommend QPE-only watch criteria for ungauged tier.
  7. St. Joe→Harriet antecedent-insensitivity: 4 events confirm 8–11 hr at high flow regardless of conditions. Investigate channel-geometry / floodplain characteristics that produce this anomaly relative to upstream segments. Day 102 adds: the two gauges also converge to near-identical absolute recession rates (~32 vs 37 cfs/hr) even at elevated flow — segment is hydraulically uniform.
  8. Long-term baseflow trajectory: Day 65 was not a floor; Days 75–79, 86, 95, 97 all set new lows. Is there a true seasonal floor below current observations, or does drying continue indefinitely without recharge? Need a 30+ day dry stretch to test. (Spring 2026 has been event-rich; no such stretch yet observed post-Event-19.)
  9. Pruitt karst secondary peak quantification: Two-mode response observed in Events 12, 15. Always present at lower magnitude under wet conditions, or only when specific Pruitt-zone HUCs (Cove, Hoskin) get concentrated forcing? Watch for next moderate Pruitt-zone-concentrated event.
  10. Detection-threshold lower bound under saturated-recession conditions: Days 95, 97 baselines show entire watershed in clean recession; subsequent sub-threshold pulses (0.1–0.4") get absorbed completely. Establish minimum forcing required to perturb a flat-recession watershed at each gauge.
  11. High-flow recession-rate calibration (new, Day 102): Day 102 provides a clean ~Day-1–2 post-peak high-flow recession-only day (St. Joe ~32 cfs/hr, Harriet ~37 cfs/hr at ~1300–2500 cfs). Combined with Days 95/97 pipeline-empty rates (~10–15 cfs/hr at low flow), this begins to define a flow-dependent recession-rate curve. Collect more post-peak recession-only days to fit dQ/dt vs Q.

End of document.